Saturday, December 31, 2011

Prepare For The True Solution (This Is Our Last Chance)

Some may say this is crazy, but I will proceed with the necessary conclusion that can overturn the problem known as the U.S. government.  But to begin I must outline what exactly the problem is.  Is it big government?  Or is it more than just big government?  This is such an elaborate question that definitely needs a lot of attention.  One of the biggest reasons why we are in this mess is big government.  But, another big issue deals with some of the perhaps third party effects that occur from the fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. government.  So let me try and point out some of these third party effects that do our market no good and our everyday, normal lives.

I.                   The U.S. dollar
Why is the dollar failing?  Why is China surpassing us?  Why this and Why that?  Well there is a simple answer for this.  Let us look at some major historical facts that need to be remembered.  First, the silver dollar use to be the main coinage of this culture.  Second, our dollar was backed by an asset that never loses value, Gold.  Third, somewhere in the latter 20th century, debt became our currency.
            The first two historical facts represent how our currency was once backed by assets that rarely lose their value.  Gold and silver are always great assets to invest in.  However, some found it an inconvenience to carry around gold and silver coin.  Thus, the dollar was printed on paper; this was a more convenient method of transaction.
            So far so good right?  Well no, it gets worse from here.  Government, under the FDR, removed the domestic use of the gold standard on the dollar but leaving in place the use of that asset in foreign economic practices.  Richard Nixon will go on to completely alleviate the use of the gold standard.  So what exactly is our dollar backed by?  Well from my best guess it would be the full faith of credit of the U.S. government.  Now we got to discuss what this means.  Does this mean the property the U.S. government has?  Does this include its subjects?  This is scary stuff to think about.
            Perhaps this is simple discussion, but through the use of reason we can completely dismantle the monetary policy of this government.  The main reason I say this, and this is almost an undisputable fact, is because our currency is debt.  We pay for things with debt.  Now what value does debt have?  The value is not a good one.  Debt assumes two things.  First, you don’t have the money need it and second, you have to pay it back.  Those are negative implications to value making debt having only one valuable notion to its name, being able to use the money to create things that were not there before.  So, Keynesian economics, as it is referred to, was born.  However, as Milton Friedman notes, Keynes would have never expected to see it to such a level as it has been taken today.  Because debt is now our currency, the value of what we actually have has the reciprocal effect on the value of the dollar.  Inflation is argued as the cure, but never actually cures anything.

II.                Presidential Power
I feel as if this is the most overlooked problem, especially in the current presidential race that is about to finish in Iowa.  The main expansion took place during FDR, as we all know.  My main argument is that the role of the president has become so big that democratic tyranny now makes sense for our nation.  Mark Levin once labeled it as soft tyranny.  I’ll stick with democratic tyranny, because we pick our tyrants, whether soft or hard.
The carnival show of the presidency has persuaded people in the U.S. to be utterly dependent on the president.  “As president, I will” is a commonly used term.  Constitutionally speaking, the following words should say “be commander in chief and head our military in war and sign bills into power or veto them.”  Last time I checked, practicing in the legislative process was not part of the President’s duties.  The only time the president can interfere with the legislative side of the federal government is when he receives the bill on his desk.  In today’s reality, the president is pushing his legislative agenda through.  This ameliorates freedom.  Now we our presidents as angels and saints like a third world country that is brainwashed by their dictator would.

III.             The solution
The only solution, now that we have dug ourselves in so much debt is both terrifying and tough.  Thomas Jefferson once declared:
“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

This notion is more true today than it was in 1776.  The U.S. government is destructive of those ends, “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
            Thomas Jefferson warns us that we must destroy this government.  As citizens, we are the ones that government must get consent on.  We are the ones that must remove a government that dismantles our rights and eliminates happiness from our society.  Walking around, do you think people are happy?
            I know that the Department of Homeland Security will mark me as a terrorist, but the truth is they will use that power against the citizens because they know we can rise up and remove them from their positions of power.  In political sense, we should be able to shift the ideology into a more correct one.  However, the elitist of this country have finally succumbed a good majority of the minds out there.  Perhaps Mark Steyn got it right when he said there will not be an America here soon; sooner than expected. 
            Honestly, I think this is the last election we got before it is too late for us.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Cutting Payroll taxes won't solve anything

Recently, both parties in congress have been in heated arguments over the newly formed government solution to all of our problems.  The solution....cut payroll taxes.

The question I have is this.  How in the world will this work?  If the government spending outweighs the amount of revenue they will bring in with these tax cuts, how can they cover the bill they are racking up?  Government has half the equation needed for a healthy economy to start rebuilding itself.  Cutting taxes is the first step.  The second step is simply to cut spending.  Only one Republican presidential candidate has called for this drastic change to government, Ron Paul.  He would call on government to remove itself from the equation and allow competition between businesses to create more jobs, better wages, cheaper goods, etc.

Government cannot solve this problem.  When will we wake up and see the light.

Monday, December 12, 2011

The Doctor of Ages does Politics

Some of you may only recognize Thomas Aquinas as a great theologian of the high medieval period.  The truth is his political treatise offers a compelling form of government that is highly similar to the one that our founding fathers had in mind.  Although most just toss Aquinas' politics to the curve, I offer a complete outline of his political, legal, and economic thoughts in my most recent work.  If you are having troubles explaining to your liberal friends why a government that governs least is best, then download this.  Share it.  Love it.  


Download here:  http://www.mediafire.com/?pt0k9h1kskybygt

Monday, November 28, 2011

Barney Frank Steps Down

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/28/politics/barney-frank/index.html

Finally, after 32 years of service (if that's what we want to call it) Barney Frank is not seeking reelection in 2012

The Possible reasons are this:
1.) He realizes that he will not win reelection this time around.
2.) His policies have failed us and wants to abandon congress so he doesn't receive all the blame.
3.) Constantly lying to people has gotten stressful
4.) He wants to retire and live off of the tax payers tip.
5.) All of the above.

I'll go with answer 5.

I do not have too many words on this issue like most people do.  So for now I'll leave it with the list I left.

Friday, November 18, 2011

The Republican Problem

I feel it is immensely important to understand the fundamental issue that will plague the Republican party, as well as the Democrats.  Today, as I was listening to Laura Ingraham show, a light bulb illuminated my mind.  Ingraham was going on and on about how "America is looking for a leader, to fix things".

No personal offense to Laura Ingraham, but she keeps on purporting the same issue that is plaguing America.  A leader will never cure the evils of society.  The power the president has is borderline tyranny.  We practically live in a despotic regime as it is, why bring on someone of a different party to carry on the despotism?  The president is not suppose to be the fixer-upper guy.  Allowing citizens to be free to follow their own inclinations is the fundamental goal our society needs to reach; the Republican party is far from making that their objective.

Obama's policies have failed.  Just wake up and realize the inevitable truth.  Do you think the government will release the true unemployment percentage?  Most Americans understand this.  The solution, however, does not rest in some Republican party candidate.  Limited Government means limited government.  This means the president should not create the solution.  The only solution to the problem is if both parties argue for no solution.

What is overly apparent is that the Republican Party candidates for president have not advocated for this kind of solution.  President Obama does not advocate for this solution either so do not get the idea that I am anti-Republican party.  The point that is of utter importance is whether or not the Republican party will return to their original philosophy of a limited government and a free market.  What seems apparent is that they believe they can cure societies' evils just like President Obama believed that redistributing the wealth is the best economic system which will bring Utopia.

Let me make this clear in one sentence.  The Republican Party candidates have done nothing but construct solutions which makes room for some elitist to walk in and continue the despotic system we are current citizens of.

I think the bold makes the point quite clear.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

The Disclaimer

As I sit in my Philosophy 497 (Seminar: Thomas Aquinas) I randomly, for some reason I will never make sense of, decide to start a blog.  Surely blogs are a great step forward in the development of our society.  A place where we can share thoughts, communicate feelings, learn lemonade recipes.  In the field of ideas and rational thought, a blog has no limits.  As a community of beings in a broken world this blogging idea seems fitting.

Now I use community in its proper sense.  This is not an area to be dependent on.  The internet is not a place to depend on proper truths and axioms that will mold your life and drive forward the ability of human beings to accomplish a great many things in the area of Philosophy, Science, Education, and the like.  However, the internet and its community based mode of abstracting knowledge is a great place to share.  Share is the key concept, not take.  Although we may agree or disagree at times, it is of utter importance that we use both disagreement and agreement to further our knowledge.

That is the real trick isn't it?  We live in a society of total dependence on the big idol known as Government.  Perhaps that should be the underlying presupposition everyone should understand before reading anything on this blog.  We depend, and never stop depending on the idol known as government.  And I wish I could say I did not, but the fact of the matter is that government subsidized student loans reach out and grab my arm with its disgusting hand.

Without further due I would like to extend the offer to partake in civil discussion.  Mostly, there is one rule I wish we all to pertain under:

Shaun's Rule: If the argument results in an individual calling someone an idiot without offering any more substantiate line of rational thought and/or empirical evidence, the argument is officially over and that individual must give up his beliefs and accept the winner's doctrine or construct new material.

Of course, this rule is not novel to any degree.  Its an axiom that remains objectively true throughout human history.

But for any reason, the topic of this blog is politics.  What is politics?  What's the best form of government?  How should government work?  How do politician's behave?

In the traditional sense, this deals mostly with ethics and epistemology.  However, I'm extending the study of political philosophy to the modern 21st century sense of the area of thought.  This means I must include not only Ethics and Epistemology, but also the study of Economics.  The apparent crossroad we have come to in history is how great of a role does politics and government play in the economy.  Of course in a more traditional sense, it shouldn't.  Whatever be the case, in light of today's discussion I am forced to take into account how the economy should work and how government functions within economy.

What is important to understand is that I do believe in God.  And I do believe that perhaps Adam Smith's concept of "an invisible hand" may be the result of God's grace and sovereignty.  Society must be free.  Only a free society is able to come to God at such a rapid pace.  This in turn allows free individuals to share the gospel freely to the world.  Liberation is never through government, a free market, a controlled market, or a government program.  Liberation, J. Budziszewski understood most properly, comes only through understanding that we are fallen and we need God's grace.  So let that be a note of importance as we dive deep into the study of political systems and economic institutions.